Washington Rebel Reader, Not Andrew Breitbart
The single most important news event of 2009 was the
emergence of The Virtual Newsroom. A newsroom run by a virtual army of conservative journalists famous and unknown, their individual and collective impact multiplied exponentially by millions of Internet users, radio listeners, readers and television viewers.
How did this happen? How does it work in practice?
First, perspective is needed here. Like other big news events, it didn't happen overnight. There is history, lots of it.
In the afterglow of World War II, at the dawn of the Cold War, the ideology of American liberalism reigned supreme. What began at the beginning of the 20th century as the "progressive movement" -- an ideology that believed government control in some fashion was The Answer to the everyday lives of Americans -- was now riding herd. Jeffrey Lord
This article by Lord is just too juicy to be summarized. It needs to be savored, dessicated and snorted, taken to the bathroom for privacy, dreamed on, shared.
Throughout the Vietnam-Watergate years my poor ol' Dad bemoaned the bias of the press. I think it was the influence of his years studying drama before World War II interrupted those ambitions. He could see what a crock of shit the television news was. Before it was over he despised Walter Cronkite beyond description. Now that I'm ripe in years, I can only guess what my World War II vet Dad was thinking: 'What happened to my country, Dude?' was not how he would have expressed it.
There was a cultural shift in America, such as outlined by Neal Postman, away from any pretense of conversation toward outright propaganda. One of the things you never hear a Leftist confess is that Corporate America's presentation of the "news" almost always supported their favorite causes: people were poor because of greed; America's economic might was destroying cultures, the environment, and so on; polar bears were swimming because of Americans. I didn't see very many 60 Minutes episodes where the mantras of the Left were parsed and laughed at.
No one was allowed to laugh in Soviet America.
The two worst developments in my lifetime:
The Coarsening of American Culture and, along with that, blaming whites and corporations and whoever else for one's own shortcomings; and
Political Correctness, a veritable tyranny in America. If you're white, male and middle-aged, you find yourself whispering a great deal, for fear of retaliation. Hence, I never admit "liberals" are liberal. They're intolerant, and often psycho, assholes, in my experience.
Lest you think I'm talking about a white thing, I just spoke with an Canadian-Asian (or is that Asian-Canadian?) friend in the International Corporate World who has been admonished about what to say, and not say, with respect to Indian executives. Can't insult their culture. Now, really, who would even suspect a Canadian of that? This isn't about race for me. It's about freedom.
Why aren't there more news stories on the mistreatment white males receive from Warm Fuzzy Liberals? Seems newsworthy to me, not because I'm white, but because I support freedom and prosperity. Currently the freest country in the world dictates who can talk, what they can say, and under what conditions. How did American free speech get reduced to whispering and veiled, sometimes explicit, threats? And what gave our Press confidence that they could and should determine the outcome of a presidential election? These folks who say FOX News is biased!
A president who attacks a news organization from the White House? Who demeans the one half of the country that didn't vote for him.
Can anyone spell Third World Country?
Both of these developments are killing us, like a cancer. When people say to me, "You're dark because of the work you do", my answer always is, 'It's not me who's dark. I'm just reporting what I see.'
I hope our readers will take time to read Jeffrey Lord's article Biggest Story of 2009: The Rise of the Virtual Newsroom and comment on it. This article is really a gift to us all!
Recent Comments